nba blognba blognba blog

Wrong ’Guaransheed’: Boston Celtics shouldn’t worry about 73 wins



October 21 09
Breaking NBA news mixed with analysis …

Their News: "I think we can get that Bulls record (winning 73 games). Definitely, playing with those three other guys, also combining that with the guys we have on the bench, I think we definitely can." (Rasheed Wallace, Celtics Central)

My Quick Analysis:
I’m not mad at Rasheed Wallace.

I’m not mad the temperamental post went there, suggesting his Boston Celtics could challenge the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls’ hallowed record of 72 regular season wins. And I’m not mad that Wallace - after years of deferring to others in Detroit - is re-energized and prepared to publicly discuss having success in Boston.

However, I think he should reconsider his ‘Guaransheed‘. Sure, breaking the Bulls’ record would be nice, but it’s ultimately meaningless and unnecessary for the veteran Celtics. Shooting for 73 wins would likely compromise the club’s chances at a second NBA Title in three years.

Health matters. Two years ago, Boston’s Ray Allen, Kevin Garnett, and Paul Pierce avoided major injuries, which was key in the club raising their seventeenth championship banner. ‘The Big Three’ stayed healthy because they got their rest.

Last year, ‘Father Time’ caught Garnett. The former MVP missed significant time during the regular season and the entire playoffs because of a knee injury. Without Garnett, their anchor on defense, the Celtics lost in the second round to the Orlando Magic.

Winning 73 games would require Allen, Garnett, and Pierce to play major minutes, even with Boston’s upgraded bench. And herein lies the risk -chasing a meaningless record for the sake of ego would exhaust ‘The Big Three’ and could lead to a devastating injury.

In a revamped Eastern Conference, rest and health could be the difference in a seven game playoff series. In fact, for the Celtics, staying injury-free is more important than home-court advantage.

With their exceptional defense and Coach Doc Rivers’ get-stops mentality, Boston can win road playoff games -but only at full strength. And this doesn’t happen if the Celtics get worn-down trying to break a regular season record.

Like I said, I’m not mad at Wallace’s declaration. I just don’t think winning 73 games just is especially important for Boston. 

Sound off: What do you think of the Celtics potentially chasing 73 wins? Get at us in the comment box below and follow Oly on HoopsVibe and Twitter. Photo courtesy of Paul Keleher.


10 Comments: Wrong ’Guaransheed’: Boston Celtics shouldn’t worry about 73 (...)

Posted by
Eboni
on 10.30.2009
I love the CELTS!!! And I agree this year is gonna be one of the best in the NBA!!!! All the teams seem focused! But the CELTS are exceptional everyone is on point, confident , and aggressive!!! Good luck guys! .
Posted by
B-Mac
on 10.27.2009
I just laugh when I see posts like "The Celtics ain’t a factor in 2010. No way.." I’m guessing the guy who posted it didn’t believe it himself, since he didn’t have the balls to put a name with it. Here’s the bottom line, the Celtics are every bit good enough to win 73 games. Will they? I don’t know, people get injured stuff happens. But make no mistake, they are the best team in the NBA. If KG stayed healthy last season there’s a very good chance they are going for a three-pete this season. When they won it all in ’08 the had the big 3. Now the have the big 3, plus a legit superstar point guard in Rondo. (Haters can check the almost triple double he averaged in the playoffs last year), plus Perkins, and the aquisitons of Rasheed and Daniels. They are the deepest team, and they will win it all this year. .
Posted by
J. Kelly
on 10.23.2009
Why don’t you return my emails? huh? you wanna start something? You know I’m better than Nguyen. Truth........ .
Posted by

on 10.22.2009
He said that we CAN win more than 72 games he didn’t say that we will WIN more that 72 games. If we stay healthy, people play the way they’re expected to play (i mean, hudson plays like an average backup PG in the league, not like Wade) then we will make it withot burning our players.¿will this all happend?, i dont think so, an then we wont win so many games, but that doesnt mean that ’Sheed wasnt rigthRemember, he said we CAN, he didnt said we WILL .
Posted by
fiorelladad
on 10.21.2009
It would be stupid of him to say that himself. But in this case he was asked directly by the reporter if the revamped Celtics could break the Bulls record. What is he going to say? Read his comments in the context of an answer and you’ll see he didn’t say anything crazy. .
Posted by
hastings
on 10.21.2009
Kind of ridiculous that he would say that, because it won’t happen. But, I do think they have something to prove, and this really is their last year to prove it. Good Luck Celts, you’ll need it. .
Posted by

on 10.21.2009
The Celts ain’t a factor in 2010. No way. .
Posted by
O.Sandor
on 10.21.2009
Hi no-name ... Thanks for commenting. It would be cool, I guess, but not if it comes at the expense of the NBA Title. And you proved my point, too: with so many good teams, health and rest will be even more important to winning it all and progressing in the playoffs. Thanks. O.Sandor .
Posted by
32
on 10.21.2009
Why has Nguyen got sooooooooooooooooooo many articles. It’s like I’ve died and gone to heaven! thanks hoopsvibe .
Posted by

on 10.21.2009
goood point, but wouldnt it be cool, for it to be done and them still be aiight for the playoffs, besides i want cavs to win it all. we’ll see. too many good teams this yr. has to be one the best yrs in ages. wooohoooo ! .

Post your comment:

No profanity or inaproppriate remarks. All i.p. addresses will be saved and abuse/hate posts will be reported to providers and authorities as part of the anti-spam act of 2003, thank you for posting comments on the articles only.
Any message or comment?

Who are you? (optional)


Oly Sandor

About
Oly Sandor

Daily take on NBA
Oly Sandor is an NBA analyst and sports journalist based out of Vancouver, Canada.After years of the free-lance game, Oly Sandor is bringing his unique brand of NBA analysis exclusively to (...) More