> Sports  > Hoopsvibe

 Back to NBA Articles     
  | PDF version
 Despite Early Success Los Angeles Lakers Need to Make a Move
 


 
Alden GonzalezWritten by: Alden Gonzalez - Alden was born and raised in Miami and has been interested in being a sports writer since high school (the fact that he was too slow, too weak and too short to be a professional baseball player (...) More  
 
NBA Articles (most popular)









Despite Early Success, Los Angeles Lakers Need to Make a Move

  By Alden Gonzalez
01.1.2008 - Updated on 01.1.2008

It was the flip-flop of the year (other than Billy Donovan, of course). In late May, a disgruntled Kobe Bryant – frustrated with being exited in the first round of the playoffs every year since Shaquille O’Neal left – publicly said he’d like to be traded.

All summer long, 24-second video tapes of him dissing Andrew Bynum, constant speculation of how much better the Los Angeles Lakers would’ve been with Jason Kidd or Jermaine O’Neal and quotes from head coach Phil Jackson dissing Kobe’s effort cluttered the L.A. locker room, and no one in the NBA thought Kobe would be wearing purple and gold past the month of November.

But things have changed.

We’ve now moved into early January and Bryant is averaging 27 points and five assists per game on a Lakers team sporting a 19-11 record and 2 ½ games out of first place in a tough Western Conference.

Kobe’s happy. His teammates are happy. Phil is happy. The team has developed good chemistry. Bynum is finally starting to come around. Everything is great now, right?

Don’t be fooled.

No matter how well they’re playing right now, this is the same team that simply wasn’t good enough to get deep into the playoffs.

Truth is, the Lakers are still nowhere near the elite teams in the West, and they need to make a move this season if they want to even sniff the second round. Right now, Lakers fans are delusional if they think this team – no matter how good of a regular season they have – can beat the Spurs, Mavericks, Suns, Jazz or even Nuggets in a best-of-seven series.

 

Legitimate No. 2 scorer needed

Kobe’s shoulders must be sore already, because he still has to carry this team offensively for them to win. Right now, the Lakers are giving up almost 102 points per game – 22nd in the NBA. That means the Lakers need to break 100 every single night to beat teams.

That’s fine if you’re a high-powered offensive team like the Phoenix Suns or Dallas Mavericks, but the Lakers aren’t built that way. They know they’re going to get great numbers from Kobe, but even with how well Bynum has been playing and Lamar Odom stepping up, you never know what you’re going to get from those two.

What the Lakers need is one reliable second option that they know can keep defenses honest on Kobe.

 

Get Jermaine now

How about making a second run at Jermaine O’Neal?

Would I give up Andrew Bynum for Jermaine? Yes. I know Bynum is finally looking like he’ll develop into the stud he’s supposed to be, but even if he becomes a great player, will he be better than Jermaine is right now – at 29? Probably not. Besides, Kobe has played a lot of basketball since he came to the league at 18, and who knows how much longer he can be the best player in the NBA?

This is the time, Jerry Buss. You have solid young players, the best two-guard in the NBA and one of the greatest coaches of all time. It’s time to put all your chips to the middle of the table and make a run at a championship.

There’s no way the Pacers would pass on giving up Jermaine if you put together a package that included either Jordan Farmar, Luke Walton or Ronny Turiaf along with Bynum. The Pacers would have a nice group of young players to build for the future – which is what they wanted to do since the beginning of the season – and you’d have someone that can give you 17 and 8 all year. Not only that, you have a premier shot blocker who probably would improve the Lakers’ defense.

 

Kidd is not the guy

Jason Kidd was never the answer on this team because he’s not a premier scorer. Yes he’s one of the best distributors in the NBA, but he needs the ball in his hands constantly to be at the top of his game. On this Lakers team, it’s Kobe that has the ball in his hands.

Kobe gets a bad rap for being a selfish player because of the media’s portrayal of the Shaq situation and other things he’s said, but truthfully, he’s one of the smartest players in the league and a very unselfish player on the court. As a great player, he just senses when he needs to carry the load when his team simply isn’t good enough.

Right now, Kobe has done a great job passing out of double teams, getting his teammates involved early and giving them confidence – the same thing Kidd would do.

 

The numbers

Right now, O’Neal – at $19.71 million this year – is the seventh-highest paid player in the league, and the Lakers– at $68.4 million– have the 12th-highest team salary in the NBA. The Lakers are over the NBA’s luxury tax threshold at the moment, but they would only have to pay the league $1,298,352 at the end of the year if their salaries stayed the same. They can afford Jermaine.

If they include Bynum ($2.17 million) along with a fat contract like Kwame Brown’s ($9.08 million) and other pieces, they can come close to matching O’Neal’s salary and wouldn’t be too far over the cap.

 

This team is still not good enough

Do you really think the Lakers can keep this up in the playoffs?

Once teams have several days to figure out how to limit Kobe’s role in the offense, do you trust Bynum and Odom to step up throughout a seven-game series? I don’t. At least not yet.

It doesn’t have to be Jermaine O’Neal who the Lakers go after. He’s just the most likely superstar to change teams. Besides, if the Lakers do get Jermaine, they can start: Fisher-Bryant-Odom-O’Neal-Brown/Chris Mihm.  Three scores at the 2,3 and 4 spots would complement Phil’s triangle offense pretty nicely and give this team the firepower it needs to compete with the high-octane teams of the West.  Don’t you think?

Look for Alden’s take on the hottest topic in the NBA every week. Also, check out his blog posts on the Miami Heat at least two times a week at www.mvn.com/nba-heat.

 

57 Comments: Despite Early Success, Los Angeles Lakers Need to Make a (...)

Posted by
geokie
on 01.7.2008
Well, they played straight up last night and for the record: Bynum: 23 points on 8 for 11, 13 rebounds, & 4 blocks in 34 min. O’Neal: 13 points on 6 for 14, 4 rebounds, & 2 blocks in 31 min. Any questions? .
Posted by
Eric Chen from LA
on 01.5.2008
Trade a potential superstar who is playing at near all-star level for a declining forward who is no longer an all-star? AND you want to give up Farmar. You clearly do not know your basketball. You think JO will make the Lakers a contender? That’s the missing piece? Have you seen how JO’s been playing lately? Deplete the Lakers bench, trade for a declining star, give up a potential superstar who is already having an amazing season (if he played 40 min a night he’d prob get a lot of 20 20s like Dwight Howard), and that’s your recipe for the Lakers to contend now and in the future? Your suggestion may very be well intentioned but you do not know what you’re talking about. Luckily, you’re not the Lakers GM. .
Posted by
Greg
on 01.3.2008
Are you aware that the Lakers are in the top 5 in scoring in the league?Difficult for me to start with all the things I disagree with, but suffice it to say that the Lakers are in need of defensive help, not more scoring. I found your article posted in the Lakers Usenet newsgroup. You’re getting laughed at. .
Posted by
that one guy
on 01.3.2008
Ya boy from da bay: OH god this is rich look what this loser wrote "im not a kobe hater i just want to see him fail n fail again at bball." what a duche .
Posted by
TheGr8one24
on 01.3.2008
Man!!! This is a classic Lakerhater piece. The Lakers are the team that you love or hate...there’s no in between. This guy wants to see the Lakers fail as do so many others!!! We’re starting to mesh slowly and everyones starting to get worried. If Kobe can put up 27 and we’re putting up 120...LOOK OUT!!!! Kobe’s got a team now!!!! .
Posted by
SouljahPhil...
on 01.2.2008
My goodness man..Are you crazy??? bynum looks even better than jermaine nowadays.. And if you trade bynum You need to add 2-3 players to make salaries equal..Your gonna destroy our bench which is one of the best right now..Why not trade kwame’s for another guy which could help us..maybe for artest..You just dont destroy our team right now and definitely jermaine oneal is not the answer.. Maybe if they accep kwame.,crit or farmer.,a pick or 2 and fillers.. .
Posted by
Manuel Montenegro
on 01.2.2008
The Lakers, when healthy, have the ability to compete in a seven game series with any of those teams. Fact is, any team with Kobe Bryant has a chance to compete for a series victory. But, back to topic at hand- you stated, essentially, that you would trade Jermaine for Bynum if it came down to it. Not only do the majority of people here find that notion ludicrous, but, as many have pointed out, it is logistically impossible, geokie’s post being quite spot on.Am I saying Bynum is a godsend? Not necessarily. Does he have the potential to be? I sure think so; he could very well be the best young big-man in the NBA not named Dwight Howard and perhaps Chris Bosh. I will say right now that the gap between Bynum and O’Neal isn’t nearly as wide as you make it to be- in fact, one could make the argument that Bynum, season thus far, is playing better than the aforementioned. Trading that possibility, and the Lakers long term plan along with it, for O’Neal- who is 29, which is actually getting there in age for the league, who isn’t the shining example of consistency- seems to me one of the worst moves one can make, when the surely decimating trade is all said and done.Disagree? So be it. I can guarantee you, however, that O’Neal, in no way, shape, or form, makes us more of a championship contender. .
Posted by
Ya Boy from da Bay
on 01.2.2008
The Lakers should simply get no 1 and take there 1st round exit again so kobe even looks more silly because he cant simply carry a team in the playoffs by himself and win like some other good players have in the past and then all the people that love kobe and wanna marry him i can laugh at them and there sorry a-------team 4 getting eliminated once again in the 1st round then hopefully one day kobe leaves the lakers so we can really show how many tru laker fans there our or just how many DicKK Riders there are......and no im not a kobe hater i just want to see him fail n fail again at bball bc he already rode shaq for a few .
Posted by
BABOYDAMO
on 01.2.2008
why cant the lakers sign chris webber and trade kwame and lamar for jermaine then there will be another era of the lakers vs. celtics .
Posted by
geokie
on 01.2.2008
BB: There’s no problem with your comments as far as a trade with Indiana goes. It seemed as if you thought the Lakers would be far enough under the cap in 2008 to sign O’Neal to a free agent contract if he was willing to take a $4 million cut. That doesn’t seem to fit without a whole lotta other things happening first.The Lakers would obviously do a Kwame/Odom trade for O’Neal — and the money does work. The questions are whether Indiana can get something better from another team and/or whether O’Neal has enough clout to force a trade to the Lakers.This proposal might all ready be on the Pacers’ table. They might have all ready rejected it outright or they might have responded by asking for Farmar and/or others to make it more palatable. At some point in time, the Lakers need to make a decision to go with Farmar or Crittenton, but they obviously have a lot at stake in that decision. Since the team is competitive, I think they think they can wait out a couple of things. Waiting certainly served them well in Bynum’s case. .
Posted by
Basketball Business
on 01.2.2008
geokie: the second paragraph of my last post should read "the Pacers or any other team would have have a moderately priced...". Sorry for the confusion. .
Posted by
Basketball Business
on 01.2.2008

re geokie’s reply to my original post:

Geokie:

You at least seem to know a bit about the game. However, I think you are mistaken on a couple of points.

Next year is the last year of Lamar’s contract. That is why I said he is easily traded; the Pacers would have a moderately priced, borderline all star for a year and if he does not work out, they let him go and hit the free agent market themselves. Teams that are rebuilding are often looking for trades that will ultimately bring them cap space, not necessarily talent.

As for Radmanovic, I disagree that he is overpaid. I know that $5.6 million seems like a lot, but if he were the second (or even third)scoring option on a team that ran a few plays a night for him,I believe his confidence would come back and he would be scoring 15-20/game - look at what H. Turkoglu is doing in Orlando. Radmanovic will never have plays run for him with the Lakers. Whether or not the Lakers saw Rad as part of their long term plan when they signed him is irrelevant, the point is that he has a very tradable contract.

As far as Mimm is concerned, there are teams out there that will pay him at least the 2.5 he is making with the Lakers and he will get more minutes. I am fairly sure that next year is a team option, not a player option, but even if this is not true, I think Mimm will go elswhere if it is made clear that he does not fit the Lakers plans. If not, trade him for a second round draft pick to a team that is under the salary cap.

.
Posted by
Basketball Business
on 01.2.2008

The Lakers don’t need to trade Bynum to get O’Neal, they can sign O’Neal as a free agent next year.Do people really not understand that Center and Point Guard are the most important positions in the game of basketball.

At any give time there are only a handful of true top-tier centers in the league. You do not trade a 20 year old who is on his way to being one of the best centers of the next generation for a Power Forward, even if he is an all star - as much as I like O’Neal he is not a superstar as "The Juice" claims he is.

The Lakers will keep Bynum and next year they will have Kobe, O’Neal, Fisher and Bynum to go along with Farmar, Ariza, Crittentin and the host of other young, exciting and cheep players on their bench.

That is a line-up that will attract veteran players to come and play for the league minimum just to get a shot at a ring (a-la Grant Hill, Karl Malone etc.)

And for those of you that can’t wait until next year, remember that O’Neal has already made it clear to the Pacers that he wants to be traded to the Lakers. So if the Pacers want to get anything for him (i.e. not lose him to free agency) they will have to deal him this year for whatever the Lakers are willing to give. My guess is Lamar and Kwame - the salaries will work and it gives the Pacers a reasonably priced Lamar who has flourished in the east in the past (NBA finals with Miami) and Kwame’s expiring $9 million contract.

.
Posted by
geokie
on 01.2.2008
Re: Basketball Business.Although your comments are obviously well written, I’m not sure everything flies. 1) If a free agent signing was a "longterm plan in place for some time" then why sign Rad to a slightly overpaid longterm contract. It seems as if their original plan included Rad. 2) Mihm has a player option at the end of this year which he will undoubtedly exercise. 3) Odom’s contract runs thru 2009 so his money is not available next year. For free agent money to be available, any trade would have to bring back player(s) with expiring contracts. 4) Kwame’s contract is up but they’re still $8 million over the cap so no money for O’Neal. (I think Jackson likes Kwame and wouldn’t be surprised if they offer him a reduced contract rather than lose the $9 million completely. They still need someone more dependable than Mihm to back up Bynum).Put together, I don’t see a free agent signing of O’Neal’s magnitude even with a reduction of $4 million (to say nothing of the fact that Indiana doesn’t want to lose O’Neal and get nothing in return). .
Posted by
The Juice
on 01.2.2008
I don’t wanna give up Bynum, but if it meant getting a superstar like Jermaine, I would do it.I’ve followed the Lakers since Kobe was a rookie, and I really think if they make a move for a really good scorer, they can make a run in the west. I agree. I think Bynum is expendable. This is the time to trade him...when his stock is really high. .
Posted by

on 01.2.2008
What a moronic article! Trade Bynum for Jermaine O’Neal!! How about trading him for Shaq? Or maybe for Mutombo? .
Posted by
Basketball Business
on 01.2.2008

The Lakers have had a long term plan in place for some time now to get under the salary cap and sign (not trade for) a legitimate second scorer. Why have none of you discussed this.

The Lakers are currently $15 over the cap. Kwame’s $9 million is off the books after this season as is C. Mimm’s $2.5. Lamar’s $13.25 million is very tradable going in to the last year of his contract, and there are a number of teams in this league would would love to have V. Radmanovic for $5.6 - in the right offense with a few plays being run for him he could be a nice complementary player.

Without the above mentioned contracts, the Lakers are roughly $15.4 million under the 2007 salary cap, and the 2008 cap will undoubtedly be a bit higher. J. O’Neal can opt out of his $19 million at the end of this year and I would venture a guess that he would take a reduced contract to come home to play in LA with Kobe, Bynum, Fisher and a group of exciting young players (e.g. Farmar, Ariza, Crittentin, Turiaf, Vujacic, Walton).

For those of you who think O’Neal would not take a $4 million pay cut, remember that additional salary can be loaded on to the back of a multi-year contract to make things work (a-la Rick Fox). Also, there is a big draw for players to come to big market teams where they can make big endorsement money.

Now, are all the players on the Laker bench potential stars, no. But they have shown they can work well in the Laker system and a few of them have tremendous upside - has anyone noticed that Farmar has had flashes of looking like Tony Parker when he was 20. The Spurs did not trade him away and they are reaping the benefits for their decision to let him develop on their team.

The Lakers currently have one of the most productive benches in the league and they are very young. There is no need to mortgage the future to win now when the Lakers can keep their young players and get better through free agency. Anyone who thinks that the Lakers would trade Bynum for O’Neal at this point is just not paying attention.

Of course J. O’Neal is not the only player who can, and most likely will, opt out of his contract next year. Gillbert "Hibachi" Arenas is also in this situation - hmmmm he is also from LA and made a comment earlier this year about how he could see himself on a team with Kobe.

As to whether the current Laker roster can advance beyond the first round this year; provided they are not matched up against the Spurs in the first round, I see no reason why not. The statement that the Laker’s wins over the Suns and Utah are not indicative of how a 7-game series would play out does not make any sense. If anything, a 7-game series favors that Laker, not the Suns or the Jazz:

1. Lakers have Phil Jackson.

2. Lakers are the bigger, more physical team and referees tend to swallow their whistles in the playoffs.

3. Unlike the last few years, the Laker have shown that they can score, and the Suns, Worriers, Nuggets and Jazz are all bad defensive teams.

I believe the current Laker roster will only get better as the year progresses and that they will make a run in the playoffs. Will they be in the NBA finals this year? I would not bet on it, but next year the gloves come off. The front office has done a great job of putting the Lakers in a position to be one of the elite teams for the next 10 years.

Be patient Laker fans, the good times are close at hand.

.
Posted by
geokie
on 01.2.2008
Leonard2 & Boozy995 have analyzed things pretty well as far as where the Lakers fall in the league pecking order and what they need to improve. One clarification: I’m not down on Odom and don’t feel that the Lakers need to trade him. But if they’re interested in O’Neal, he’s the only core asset I’d be willing to trade to get him. I also think it’s a tad harder (although not impossible) to build a championship team with starters who are "tweeners" and Odom still bounces back and forth between the 3 and 4-spot. Artest scares me — and I’m certainly not in the minority on that count — but talent-wise he could put the Lakers near the top, assuming they didn’t need to give up Kobe, Bynum or Odom to get him. Given Phil’s track record, it would probably be worth the risk. .
Posted by
Nermin
on 01.2.2008
I don’t know wat we r gonna do but, i think we HAVE to do sumthin..... I love Bynum but, he’s not the greatest 1 on 1 player and O’neal has proven he take people off dribble, score w/ double teams, outside J’s, finish strong so if i am Buss JUST DO IT! Just think fisher, kobe ,odom, O’neal, and brown then u got vlad, shasha, j-critt, mimh, and others off bench just depends on who we involve 4 O’neal... .
Posted by

on 01.2.2008
you are a fool thinking they can’t beat the any of those teams you just mentioned. the only team lakers are going to have trouble defeating are the spurs. You have got to watch every laker game to understand. .
  1    2   3   4   Next >  

Post your comment:

No profanity or inaproppriate remarks. All i.p. addresses will be saved and abuse/hate posts will be reported to providers and authorities as part of the anti-spam act of 2003, thank you for posting comments on the articles only.
Any message or comment?

Who are you? (optional)




Home
Basketball Forum
NBA News
NBA Features
Resources
Contact Us