| 
HoopsVibe Season Preview: Southwest Division By Christopher Sells 10.28.2008 - Updated on 10.28.2008
| With the NBA season getting ready to start up, we thought we should take a brief glimpse at the league, division by division, just so you guys have an idea of what to expect this year. However, we will not stand by any of these predictions come season’s end. Unless we’ve actually managed to get them right.
For a few seasons now, the Southwest Division has been arguably the best in basketball. Last year, that argument went away, as four of the five teams made the playoffs and won more than 50 games. On the dawn of a new season, we could looking at more of the same.
San Antonio has long been the class of the division and of the conference. After winning a championship two years ago, last year’s team faltered in the postseason as the team’s detractors complained that they were becoming too old. That criticism seems to have followed them to this season. And to make matters worse, Manu Ginobili has an ankle injury that will keep out of the early part of the season. Make no mistake, though, the Spurs have showed that, when healthy, they are a force to be reckoned with. Having Tim Duncan is a pretty good thing, too.
North of that team is another with a few questions of their own. The Dallas Mavericks look very different than they did a year ago at this time. They have a new coach, a new point guard, and, supposedly, a new outlook on how the game should be played. In theory, a team with Jason Kidd, Dirk Nowitzki and Josh Howard should be among the league’s best. However, Kidd is aging, Nowitzki has been called soft and Howard’s intelligence has been questioned. So Dallas could be really good this year (last year’s 51-win campaign was actually viewed as a down year), but if they have a fourth consecutive playoff embarrassment, it will mean nothing.
Memphis would love for its team to reach the playoffs. That won’t happen this year, but it isn’t out of reach for the future. Excepting Antoine Walker, most of the team is young and very talented and they should definitely be on your radar, even if they will struggle to win 30 games. Keep your eyes on Rudy Gay and O.J. Mayo, especially.
New Orleans discovered during last year’s playoffs that experience is definitely a factor when you’re trying to win a championship. As such, they went and signed James Posey, who has two rings in as many years, to give the team that X-factor come May and June. Still, the team will only go as far as Chris Paul takes them. Assuming his health and continued play, the Hornets could be just one player away from serious contention.
The popular pick (again) for the team that could be a new contender is the Houston Rockets. There are plenty of things that can go wrong for the team. Yao Ming and Tracy McGrady could continue their propensities for injury. The bench could end up not giving the crucial support that it gave last year. Chemistry could be a problem. Ron Artest could act like Ron Artest. But it could also go very right. There is a load of talent on the roster and the parts have great interchangeability, which is a huge plus in the team’s motion offense. Rocket fans (I know because I’m one of them) would gladly trade last year’s 22 consecutive wins for an appearance in the second round of the postseason. Then the championship talk can start.
PROJECTED ORDER OF FINISH: 1. New Orleans 2. Houston 3. San Antonio 4. Dallas 5. Memphis
What do you predict? We’d love to hear from you in the comments section. [image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jjaani/]
|
| | |
Posted by on 10.31.2008 | Man I am so tired of people doggin everything bout Houston. The have a streetball legend, Rafer Alston, the best center whi can shoot,Yao, a dominant SG, T-Mac. But people talk about how they suck but they have the best free throw shooting team in the league (oh yes and that means they’re better at it than the BOSTON CELTICS!!!). and lets not also forget that Steve Francis comes back in 4-6 weeks. So next time someone says the rockets suck tell em to get da facts straight. . | Posted by King Leo on 10.30.2008 | Payatot and Lil Dick are right. Everyone always sleep on San Antonio. Nobody really expect them to win four championships eventhough NBA GM always vote for the Spurs as the NBA’s best team but most media analysts who love flashes and cockiness always go for teams who are exciting. It is not fair to put the Rockets above the Spurs. They are not a better team, especially on the playoffs. The Spurs will beat the Hornets and the Rockets in a game 7 series anytime anywhere. . | Posted by Lil Dick on 10.28.2008 | but the rockets always make moves and end with the same result. the spurs don’t do much and always contend. stop sleeping on SA. . | Posted by on 10.28.2008 | gee, the rockets had the same record as the spurs last year. they made moves to get better. what did the spurs do? . | Posted by Payatot on 10.28.2008 | The San Antonio Spurs are always off the radar. Since the creation of Hoopsvibe, the SPURS have always been hated by this site and continue to suck up to Kobe, Lebron, and the L.A Lakers. I was not surprise to see the SPURS below the Rockets even though the Rockets have not prove anything since the season havent even started. Tim Duncan is a hall of famer and he is better than Yao and T-Mac combined. Parker and Ginobili is better than Ron Artest or any other Rockets, while Popovich is the best coach, 10 levels above Rick Adelman. . | Posted by Michael Sells on 10.28.2008 | Houston, San Antonio, New Orleans, Dallas, Memphis. That will be the order dude. You still have a couple more tries to get this right. I’m telling you my predictions make more sense . | Posted by jack on 10.28.2008 | I think you are pretty right on there. New Orleans and Houston could both potentially be 60 win teams in my opinion. . |
No profanity or inaproppriate remarks. All i.p. addresses will be saved and abuse/hate posts will be reported to providers and authorities as part of the anti-spam act of 2003, thank you for posting comments on the articles only. | | | |
| | | |
|   | | | | | NBA Features | | | | | | |
 |
|